You and I would have a much more constructive and worthwhile discussion on this topic if you made it less personal, less about me vs you, and more about the information I have talked about in my articles.

When I was deflecting, that's what I was attempting to do. Clearly it didn't work, as rather than actually address any of the points in my long article that I referred you to, you resorted to personal attacks. The fact that you even describe this as a "battle" just shows that you're not really interested in having a sensible discussion on this topic. You're more interested in finding holes in me as a person. The fact that you went to read my About Me page to try to find things to criticise me personally on, rather than take the time to address the points in my article, speaks volumes about your true intention here. By the way, I don't know where you got the drugs idea from? And whether or not I'm on the autistic spectrum should be irrelevant to the validity of what I write. That was a bit of a below-the-belt shot really.

If you would like to further discuss this topic, I will happily respond to any points in my long article that you disagree with. But if your main intention now is to just engage in a pesonal battle to make yourself feel superior, I'm afraid I'm not interested.

By the way, I highly recommend reading Sam Harris's book on free will, and watching his 80-minute lecture on the topic. I may not be qualified, but he certainly is.